Search for: "United States ex rel. v. Exelis, Inc."
Results 781 - 800
of 960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2017, 10:33 am
Works, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:36 pm
Dear Readers,I commend to you a remarkable case, U.S. ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
This was the case in United States ex rel. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
The qui tam case is titled United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
In other words, although a defendant generally does not have a duty `to warn or protect others from harm caused by a third party's conduct,’ H.B. ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
” Giles v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 3:08 pm
Previously, Shauna served as lead attorney in United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(PatLit) United Kingdom Limitation of damages in the Patents County Court (EPLAW) UKIPO issues TPN (3/2011) – hearings in cases of invalidation on relative grounds (Class 46) United States US General Does 337 apply to foreign trade secret missapropiation? [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 1:44 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wis., 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997). [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, 15-513, has its origins in Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Organovo Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Mississippi ex rel. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:33 am
Until recently, only one federal appellate court had addressed the issue, holding that the FCA does not cover post-employment retaliation.[1] However, on April 1, 2021, the Sixth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
” Relying on U.S. ex rel. [read post]
