Search for: "Washington v. Smith"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Wells pointed out that the opinion contains “a hint of reluctance,” even as it applied Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
Bexis, however, (and thus Reed Smith) being part of the defense team in Stengel, cannot comment substantively on the petition. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
<> Venancio Aguasanta Arias v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
Smith Communications, LLC v Washington County, 2014 WL 2450067 (WD Ark 6/2/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
Smith, THE SMITH APPELLATE LAW FIRM, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Drouillard. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:48 am
Watch this space, the Washington e-Bulletins, our blog or Twitter for more alerts and news. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:00 am
James V. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The key decision in this line of authority is the intuitively attractive yet controversial and somewhat confounding 1982 ruling in Washington v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:29 pm
The US Court of Federal Claims issued an order today formally lifting the injunction on payments to and from NPO Energomash for RD-180 engines used by United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V rocket. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
Washington, D.C. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
See generally Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, and Douglas Altman, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2001). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
Smith Criticizes EPA for Standing by Secret Science - Washington, D.C. Science, Space, and Technology Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) today released the following statement in response to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy's decision to stand by the agency's use of. . . [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
(Incidentally, for a fascinating look at how Magistrate Judge Smith and Magistrate Judge Facciola consult each other and other judges on these questions, see this Washington Post story from last week.) [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
Summarizing Judge Leon’s reasons for not following Smith v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:33 am
Washington. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
– Roanoke attorney Josh Johnson of Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore on the firm’s Virginia Construction Law Update McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
– Washington, DC attorney Dana Frix of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives What do Clients Feel about the NSA Evesdropping on Attorney-Client Phone Conversations? [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:20 am
Smith is a partner in Jenner & Block’s Washington, DC office, where he chairs the firm’s Appellate & Supreme Court Practice. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
See U.S. v. [read post]