Search for: "H. H." Results 7981 - 8000 of 67,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 11:42 am by Molly Lockwood
Cikes served as a judicial extern for United States District Court Judge William H. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The Supreme Court properly concludes that there is no standing to challenge a legal provision that has no effect. ] As expected, the Supreme Court rejected Texas' latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act in California v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
The address changes are listed on New Alert below, this will affect Premium Processing Mail, H-1B Cap Mail and all other mail addresses to this service center location! [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
ABA, The Tax Lawyer Transitions Editorial Leadership: Longtime member of The Tax Lawyer editorial team William H. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:45 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Before this additional feature went live, we did user testing with a working prototype in one of our development environments…” [h/t Pete Weiss] [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 1:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[Progressives are increasingly worried that Justice Breyer will overstay his time on the Court.] [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
" One of the essays published by Northwestern Law Review was by legal historian H. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Other related cases filed with the court this year—now 13—were also assigned to Judge Bruce H. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:09 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The Senate Minority Leader's remarks add some urgency to progressive appeals for Justice Breyer to retire.] [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Unknown
Last week, reader Morris directed my attention to an article analyzing H&R Block stock from an investment perspective. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[The Biden Administration suffers a significant setback in its efforts to curb fossil fuel development.] [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 12:21 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In this EQE appeal against a decision awarding 41 marks for paper B 2019, "requests were made to revoke the decision and to have to quantify the extent to which the advantage of the participants in the "pilot project" of the EQE 2019 was reflected in a better result, and based on this knowledge, in particular to reevaluate task B of the complainant, so that the complainant's entire 2019 EQE is deemed to have been passed". [read post]