Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 7981 - 8000
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2015, 5:29 am
Consider Radley Balko’s extensive reporting on the failings of bite mark analysis. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
When that happens it is often the end of the matter, with the infringing party seldom taking any action to persuade registrars to change their mind. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Seems that maybe, perhaps, the matter of whether PING PONG really functions as a trademark will be settled? [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
, then shouldn’t a jury get to decide it and not the Sixth Circuit, given that court’s conclusion that the matter is not free from doubt? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
Dole where where the matter of funding for the highway, suppose Congress said, and if you don’t build the highways, you have to go 35 miles an hour all over the State. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:29 am
But that was two weeks ago, so that shouldn’t matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
In other words, Professor Ernst reads Motion Picture Patents to hold that exhaustion shielded the film manufacturer from liability because otherwise the patent owner could interfere with a projector owner’s use of the machines themselves.[11] But Motion Picture Patents doesn’t go that far. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:51 am
It’s not shameful nor the mark of failure. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
. with subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
Case Law, Canada: Baglow v Smith, defence of “fair comment” succeeds in landmark blogging libel case
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm
Fair Comment The Judge accepted that the words complained of were on a matter of public interest, namely the case of Omar Khadr [223]. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:55 pm
Cir. 2003) (inter- nal quotation marks, citation omitted). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
“Tony” Newell tried for vision and poetry and hit the mark (especially in his closing) more than he missed it. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:43 am
Mark Martins. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
Mark Martins, says his side’s review continues apace. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
Generally, this isn’t a good idea because it may result in misunderstandings between the parties about what each party wants in the event the other party doesn’t perform. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is about a business that got a bunch of trade marks covering the somewhat unregistrable word "supreme", and then decided to bring proceedings against a defendant who wasn't using the word as a trade mark and whose use of it went back 20 years, recounts Jeremy.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:33 am
We are not as good a person as Mark Bennett. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:49 am
The IPKat's not sure why EURid, the EU domain name registry, isn't looked at here, but he's sure there's a good reason]. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
I haven’t finished. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
Farmers assigned Mark Babb as the claims representative to inspect the car for damages and prepare a written estimate. [read post]
