Search for: "Read v. United States"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 30,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Hardwick v. 3M Company, Case No. 2:18-cv-1185 (S.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Without the Zeran v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:52 am
United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 5:11 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
Grimm, No. 16-273) dealing with a different civil rights law, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which provides that in a school district receiving federal financial assistance, “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, . . . be subjected to discrimination. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:45 pm
United States Automobile Association, No. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
In a 2017 concurring opinion in Hively v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:30 am
Clayton County and Zarda v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
[iii] United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:45 am
United States — In its prior decision in Taylor v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:14 am
United States of America v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:16 am
The United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion on misclassification of workers in the case of Priya Verma v. 3001 Castor, Inc., which found that adult dancers were employees entitled to the protection of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation.Ramos v. [read post]
