Search for: "Samuels" Results 7981 - 8000 of 14,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by Lindsay Griffiths
from Miller Samuel (Scotland) ILN IP Insider: AUSTRALIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW UPDATE from Gadens Lawyers (Australia) EKAER rebooted – concessions for multinationals from Jalsovszky Law Firm (Hungary) ILN IP Insider: US Federal Government Focusing On Trade Secret Legislation, Enforcement & Policy from Epstein Becker & Green (US)   [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:45 am by Paul Caron
I received a press release and executive summary of a forthcoming article in the Buffalo Law Review by Edward Adams (Minnesota) & Samuel Engel, Does Law School Still Make Economic Sense? [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) Sources: Letter to FinCEN (.pdf) Corruption Currents: Treasury Urged to Rule on Real Estate Risks by Samuel Rubenfeld in WSJ.com’s Risk & Compliance Report Towers of Secrecy by Louise Story and Stephanie Saul in the New York Times Treasury Urged to Scrutinize Foreign Real Estate Buyers for Money-Laundering Risk by Stephanie Saul in the New York Times U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
Samuels 14-844Issue: Whether, when a prisoner files more than one case or appeal in the federal courts in forma pauperis, the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 11:17 am
Please send a curriculum vitae and a 200 to 250 word paper proposal by April 3 to Richard Samuel Deese, Center for Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning at Boston University: rsdeese@bu.edu [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, which had the full support of seven other Justices — although one of them, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:22 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
The plaintiff, Samuel Brewer, sued his employer claiming discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 related to his termination. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:01 pm by Joe Patrice
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:49 am by Lindsay Griffiths
from McDonald Hopkins (US)   ILN IP Insider: Canada: Combating Counterfeit Products Act Receives Royal Assent from Clark Wilson (Canada)   Estate Planning for Parents of Young Children from Harrison & Moberly (US)   Sports Direct Facing Multi-Million Claim Over Zero Hour Contracts from Miller Samuel (Scotland)   ILN IP Insider: Canada: All the News – A Canadian IP Perspective from Fogler Rubinoff (Canada)   [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on the oral argument; at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, he dissects the argument further, concluding that “I do not think that Justices Samuel Alito and Scalia will ultimately vote to save Obamacare. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court Justice) Samuel Alito, when he was on the Third Circuit, stating that because the materiality standards for Rule 10b-5 and Item 303 differ significantly, a violation of Item 303 “does not automatically give rise to a material omission under Rule 10b-5. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 1:05 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
 ChairDr Maks Del Mar, Queen Mary University of LondonSpeakersProfessor Fernanda Pirie, University of OxfordProfessor Geoffrey Samuel, University of KentProfessor Matthias Siems, Durham UniversityProfessor Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of LondonCommentatorsDr Jacco Bomhoff, London School of EconomicsDr Jen Hendry, University of LeedsProfessor William Twining, University College LondonProfessor Mark van Hoecke, Ghent UniversityDr Leone Niglia, University of ExeterProgramme3pm… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm by Bill Marler
Friday, March 06, 2015 9:00 AM – 3:30 PM (Pacific Time) Seattle University 901 12th Avenue Sullivan Hall Seattle, Washington 98122 United States Map and Directions 4.0 General CLE Credits, approved | WSBA Activity ID #394410 8:30AM Registration and Breakfast 9:00 AM Opening Remarks 9:15-10:30 AM Panel 1 – “Re-Tooling Fisheries: Where Does Food Fit Among Environmental and Public Health Paradigms” Moderator: Clifford Villa, Adjunct Professor, Seattle University School of Law;… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm by Editorial Advisory Board
We support Delegate Samuel (“Sandy”) Rosenberg’s proposed House Bill 348, “Civil Right to Counsel-Implementation”), and encourage the General Assembly to pass it this session as long as it is budget-neutral. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:05 am by Guest Blogger
 It was apparent from the Justices’ questions that many of them came into oral argument with strong views about the case, and Justice Samuel Alito was no exception. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Professor Amelia Smith Rinehart (University of Utah) Recently, the Federal Circuit held that the New York Times and others infringed patents claiming methods and systems for delivering content to smartphones.[1] In a related Patently-O essay, Professor Sam Ernst states that the Federal Circuit’s opinion in Helferich is “directly contrary to Supreme Court precedent and represents a fundamental misunderstanding of one of the core purposes of the exhaustion doctrine. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:11 am by Rich McHugh
  Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito appeared skeptical of the position of the federal government supporting the provision of subsidies, even though some observers felt the tenor of their probing was less aggressive than might have been expected. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Marcia Coyle at both The National Law Journal (subscription required) and PBS NewsHour (video), Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News, who looks at the role of Justice Anthony Kennedy and at a proposal floated by Justice Samuel Alito, and Connie Cass of the Associated Press (via the Montana Standard). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:50 pm by Amy Howe
  Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg all seemed like solid votes for the federal government, defending the subsidies, while the challengers could clearly count on the votes of Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito. [read post]