Search for: "Smith v. SMITH"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 16,224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:31 am
Rostholder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
The crux of the dispute—between Chief Judge Kozinski and the dissenting Judge Smith—is whether Cindy Garcia has a copyright interest in her performance. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
Rostholder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
” However, in Amato v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:23 pm
Obama, Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:42 pm
Eldred v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:20 pm
But it's clearly new.I think Judge Smith has a pretty good point that (1) district courts are given a pretty large amount of discretion with preliminary injunction decisions, and it's fairly aggressive for the Ninth Circuit to step in and reverse the district court here, and (2) mandatory injunctions -- like ordering Google to take down the movie -- are subject to even more scrutiny. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:14 am
Pease On July 16, 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an order finding Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”), Daniel Brin, Scott Connelly, Karen Levine, and Ryan Smith (together with Barclays, “Defendants”) in violation of FERC’s anti-manipulation regulations and assessed significant penalties.[1] The Defendants chose to have the validity of the order tried de novo in [...] [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
In the 1996 case of Romer v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:37 am
Reuter v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:46 pm
A client memo from Reed Smith informs us that: The recent decision in Badowski v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.")AC34321 - Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
CASE NO. 2: Sardis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
Meanwhile Roy Greenslade suggested that Lord Chris Smith – a member of the IPSO “Foundation Group” – is a “shoo-in” as its chair. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm
The decision of the European Court of Justice in Svensson v Retriever Sverige AB (Case C‑466/12, 13 February 2014) has established some important points about the legality of linking under EU copyright law: A clickable direct link to a copyright work made freely available on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder does not infringe. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm
Smith to the state constitutional claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
