Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 11,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 8:58 am
Double Jeopardy in a Recent Colorado Case In People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:53 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:30 am
Public Citizen massively expanded our Democracy Is For People campaign to overturn the Supreme Court's disastrous Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
In the courts: Staff Side of the Police Negotiating Board & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor [2011] EWHC 3175 (Admin) (02 December 2011) December 2, 2011 Change in police pension inflation index, partly done to save money, ruled lawful by High Court. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
The scheme is intended "to promote high quality patents and expedite processing of patent applications in both offices by avoiding duplicative work", not to mention greater costs-savings for patent applicants. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:59 pm
Given the resources you have to defend this as a financial services provider (see Gucci v Curveal), I doubt that there are beads of sweat on your forehead as you read this. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Ninth, En Banc, Gets its "Citations" Right -- Leal-Felix and Sentencing Guidelines
3 Dec 2011, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
Another case, Duncan v. [read post]
Rehearing granted and modified opinion issued in arbitration case: Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Corp.
2 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
” (Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
Butler (1936); Hopkins Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
These are all normative questions, but it should be clear now that the legal fiction that concerns me has saved us from having to ask them. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:16 am
” Reference was then made to the case law establishing the following: (a) “[V]ery frequently words and behaviour with which police officers will be wearily familiar will have little emotional impact on them save that of boredom” (per Glidewell LJ, DPP v Orum [1989] Cr App Rep 261). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
McGraw v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:17 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: More secret justice on the horizon Angus McCullough QC special advocate for Russian cleared of spying in deportation case Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play 9/11 ten years on Even more secret evidence for government in Al Rawi case Mutual confidentiality between intelligence services trumped by open justice requirements [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm
Modaresi v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:15 am
It cannot save Ms. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Not for now, though, and if one judge on the panel in State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:20 pm
In the matter of Happold v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:52 am
In Rose v. [read post]
