Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 21,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 4:24 am
” Plaintiffs further alleged: When Donor #9623 first came to Xytex, he worked as a janitor/waiter and had dropped out of school. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am
(the original plaintiff, which is why I call the case Varsity Brands, hereafter “Varsity”) had registered copyrights. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
After testing the electrical connection starter, the vehicle ran him over and dragged him through the parking lot of the automobile repair shop, crushing his spine. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
In affirming the trial court’s judgment denying the plaintiff/appellant group’s mandate petition, the Court of Appeal found no merit in any of the group’s arguments that County failed to comply with a number of procedural, informational and substantive CEQA requirements. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:29 am
This would violate the well-established principle, applied both at law and in equity, that a plaintiff is entitled to only a single recovery for a distinct harm. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 7:20 am
The court runs through the standard multi-factor likelihood of consumer confusion test and finds most factors favor the defendant. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:46 am
The plaintiff did not ask it to impose any new obligations on employers, said the court, nor did it “do so by allowing this case to proceed. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Assessing the Theory of Strict Liability There is an exception to the legal burden on the plaintiff for product liability claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Assessing the Theory of Strict Liability There is an exception to the legal burden on the plaintiff for product liability claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Assessing the Theory of Strict Liability There is an exception to the legal burden on the plaintiff for product liability claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
The Court’s “imagination” test does not differ significantly from the statute’s “separability” test – unless it does. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:39 pm
In a 2014 decision, the Sixth Circuit reversed, applying the pre-Reed test for content neutrality. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
Those changes limited the “probative value” of the President’s campaign statements in demonstrating the religious animus required for a violation of the Establishment Clause under the Supreme Court’s test in Lemon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
Sacramento Ovarian Cancer Attorney I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento ovarian cancer attorney. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 11:10 am
The irony of the Zoloft case and many other litigations was that the defense was not using significance testing in the way that Rothman had criticized; rather the plaintiffs were over-endorsing statistical significance that was nominal, plagued by multi-testing, and inconsistent. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm
Twitter defamation cases may be instances where a plaintiff is unlikely to be able to establish serious harm to reputation. [read post]
Theranos Attempts to Skirt Class Action Suit by Arguing Private Equity Group Investors Lack Standing
24 Mar 2017, 11:58 am
Theranos is a biotech company founded in 2003 on the premise of developing and producing cheap and rapid biomatter testing capabilities. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
Promega Corporation owns the Tautz patent, which claims a genetic testing toolkit comprising five components. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
The DOL’s decision was that only employers of “service employees” as defined by the DOL could utilize the credit, and Plaintiff’s employees were not service employees. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
” The court then stated that the but for test standard is the applicable standard. [read post]
