Search for: "Warne v. State" Results 7981 - 8000 of 14,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2024, 9:54 am by Joe Mullin
They warn:  “The changes proposed in PERA open the door to patent compounds that exist in nature which nobody invented, but are newly discovered,” the group writes. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
, 2010 WL 4870149, at *7 (quoting State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:16 am by Karine Bannelier
And, second, they warned of the potential risk that authoritarian countries could try to transform a U.N. cybercrime convention into an information control treaty, with provisions dangerous for internet freedoms and human rights. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Davis, which held that lawyers' ineffective work on state habeas proceedings did not excuse a procedural default because there's no constitutional right to counsel in state habeas proceedings. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm by Karwan Eskerie
Vejdeland and Others v Sweden (Application no. 1813/07) – Read judgment  “Will both teacher and pupils simply become the next victims of the tyranny of tolerance, heretics, whose dissent from state-imposed orthodoxy must be crushed at all costs? [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1341 Title: United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:02 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Tonchev and Others v Bulgaria [2022] ECHR 1072 [in French], the applicants were ministers of  Evangelical Churches in Burgas and Evangelical religious associations based in Burgas. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the Federal Court’s decision of Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
    But Riverside also has a Federal Court outpost, and that's where they've been trying the Mattel v. [read post]