Search for: "Banks v. US" Results 8001 - 8020 of 14,531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2013, 2:11 pm by Cindy Cohn
The government is using phone records for these activities, but says it is not using the database it creates under the so-called 215 program or, as EFF calls it in our First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Can't Escape Hotfile's Claim of Abusing Anti-Piracy Tool http://t.co/E7PLsMuYNK via @feedly -> Link to Disney v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm by Jordan Deering
As a result of the decision in 581257 Alberta Ltd. v Aujla, 2013 ABCA 16, employers may more easily recover assets stolen, converted or misappropriated by dishonest employees using a civil cause of action. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2013-08-26 Defendant State_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (3) Affirmation in Support of State Defendant_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (2) Exhibit A – Amended Answer and Counterclaim (3) Exhibit B – letters from Banks (3) Exhibit C – 2012-05-24 Statement by Counsel (3) Exhibit D 2013-07-11 Chief_s Correspondence to FERC (2) US intervention materials here. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:47 am by Trent Dykes
  Title V of the JOBS Act raised the limit on the number of shareholders a company may have before it triggers public reporting requirements from 500 to 2,000 accredited investors. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
An example of such art would be secret public use of a claimed method that predated a patent filing, such as described in Metallizing Engineering Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:47 am by Trent Dykes
Title V of the JOBS Act raised the limit on the number of shareholders a company may have before it triggers public reporting requirements from 500 to 2,000 accredited investors. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am by Steve Kalar
How to Use: Like the interstate commerce element in Section 922(g)(1) cases (felon in possession), or the FDIC insurance requirement in bank robbery trials, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Catherine Coulter
Computer Use in the Workplace: Much has been written about the extent to which employers can monitor an employee’s computer use in the workplace, particularly in light of the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2012 decision in the case of R v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
It's good to know that the judges take notice of us, since we spend so much time taking of notice of them. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am by Andrew Frisch
§ 203(e)(4); and “individuals who volunteer their services solely for humanitarian purposes to private non-profit food banks and who receive from the food banks groceries,” id. [read post]