Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 17,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
The claim refers to "molecular weight" and does not refer to "average molecular weight. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:18 am
How does one “drop the gun” one doesn’t possess? [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Which he does. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
That's shocking, says Merpel]Does this mean that s28B must be struck down? [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:12 am
A new entrant with no interest in any other mass communication outlet is entitled to a 35% credit, which means they would pay only 65% of their winning bid. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
A new entrant with no interest in any other mass communication outlet is entitled to a 35% credit, which means they would pay only 65% of their winning bid. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:23 pm
As I said, the New York Times filled the space that abovethelaw now does of policing law schools. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:07 pm
The driver, Tennille Lomahukluh, 35, was placed under arrest. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:36 pm
Also, due to the shortage of skilled labor in Vietnam, FIEs have had to provide additional training to 20%-35% of their newly hired workers. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm
Although ostensibly a claim-construction case, the ultimate issue here is actually whether the “molecular weight” term is unduly indefinite under the standards of 35 U.S.C. 112(b). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
” Nexgen, 2015 WL 3669933, at *35. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:02 am
This does not say anything about its priorities. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:23 pm
Here's how Llewellyn walked back from his statement: Accused by students of saying that he would like to see 35% of the first year class flunk because of their laziness, and with having given an unusually difficult examination in contracts, Dr. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
According to the Examiner, Simpson meant that "when a trademark or trade name is used in a claim as a limitation to identify or describe a particular material or product, the claim does not comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
The [patent-in-suit] does not simply perform a pre-existing business practice on the internet, but neither does it solve a business problem created by internet commerce. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:02 pm
§ 112, paragraph6.1In this second time around, Williamson II, the majorityreverses itself to conclude that the “distributed learningcontrol module” term does not recite sufficientstructure, is governed by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:42 am
Citrix (discussed here), the majority held that the use of the word “module” does not invoke the means-plus-function language of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:57 am
“Old school” does not make the grade. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:28 pm
The credit is worth between 20 and 35 percent of your allowable expenses. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
• An increase from the current $6 fee to a $35 fee that must be paid to the garnishee at the time a garnishment is served on the garnishee. [read post]
