Search for: "Ex Parte Mays" Results 8001 - 8020 of 12,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2012, 2:01 pm by Mark Terry
The case of Ex parte Ruiz (Appeal No. 2012-00970) involved a GoDaddy software invention used to register domain names. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:10 am by stevehansen
  As with ex parte reexamination, an inter partes review may only be based on patents, published patent applications, or other printed publications. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 7:45 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
” “Ex nihilo nihil fit is a maxim meaning ‘From nothing, comes nothing. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 7:36 am by Thomas Heintzman
” “Ex nihilo nihil fit is a maxim meaning ‘From nothing, comes nothing. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 8:21 am by Jake Ward
  Only available for patents having an effective filing date (earliest priority date) on or after March 16, 2013.  PGR Standard – it is “more likely than not” that at least one of the claims challenged is unpatentable.  IPR and existing ex parte reexaminations available after post-grant review period ends.  IPR Standard – a reasonable likelihood that the requester would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged… [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
  “Material fact” has been defined as a fact falling into any one of the following categories:  [A fact] having legal significance which would . . . control the legal relations of the parties; one upon which the outcome of the litigation depends in whole or in part; one on which the controversy may be determined; one which will affect the outcome of the case depending on its resolution; or, one which constitutes a part of the plaintiff’s cause… [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
  “Material fact” has been defined as a fact falling into any one of the following categories:  [A fact] having legal significance which would . . . control the legal relations of the parties; one upon which the outcome of the litigation depends in whole or in part; one on which the controversy may be determined; one which will affect the outcome of the case depending on its resolution; or, one which constitutes a part of the plaintiff’s cause… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:37 pm by Mark Terry
Tuesdays decision of Ex parte Hoon-Jae Ki (Appeal No. 2010-005320) provides a glimpse of how the Board regards Wikipedia definitions. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am by Guy-Uriel Charles
  For example, the current kerfuffle over voter identification laws did not spring ex nihilo. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am by Robert Steele
See id. at 649 (quoting Chief Justice Marshall in Ex parte Burr, 22 U.S. 529, 530 (1824)). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:30 am by sunupgroup
., approximately one out of every 3 children will be a part of a blended family by the age of 18. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:33 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
A declaration of inventorship may currently be submitted as part of the PCT application, as provided for in PCT Rule 4.1 7(iv), for example. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:09 am
Os ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) resolveram nesta quarta-feira (12) uma questão de ordem no Recurso Extraordinário com Agravo (ARE) 663637, interposto contra decisão do ex-presidente da Corte, ministro Cezar Peluso (aposentado), que negou seguimento ao recurso por ausência de preliminar de repercussão geral. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:45 am by Joe Sanders
He gained publicity as a councillor in 1998 for taking part in pioneering “roving surgeries”. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 am by Michael DelSignore
A conviction on a child endangerment charge may impact not only custody arrangements, but also your ability to work in certain career fields (i.e., teaching, law enforcement, etc.). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:09 pm
Após os saques efetuados na boca do caixa, eles não tinham mais controle sobre o que seria feito com tais valores. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:47 am by Ed Wallis
The phrase is qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur, or, “he who sues for the king as well for himself. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the BPAI decision Ex Parte Brochu -->** Of "broadest reasonable interpretation" [BRI]:-->During examination of a patent application, pending claims are given theirbroadest reasonable construction consistent with the specification. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:10 am by Gene Quinn
 Ex parte reexamination fees go up between 300% and 600%. [read post]