Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 16,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:32 am
” The Justice Department and civil rights groups that filed court challenges to the Texas law had hoped that it would be a significant test case of the continuing effect of the Voting Rights Act after the Supreme Court had nullified a key section of the Act in its 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm
Nothing in the bill is intended to limit or otherwise prevent the use of any type of encryption within the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
The UK government’s hope is that this new exception will cause UK law to reflect common consumer practice more closely in this area. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
The Anjum decision provides the most fulsome analysis of the current state of the law in the Second Circuit regarding Offers of Judgment made in FLSA cases following the Supreme Court’s important decision last year in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:22 pm
Texas put the new law into use in three state elections, doing so initially soon after the Supreme Court in its 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:08 am
We are happy to spread the word on Booker, hope it gets published, and hope that other courts follow its path. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:04 am
For example, his first summary concerns Owens v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:40 pm
And DeGregory v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
¶34 (quoting Villa v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm
State of North Carolina, No. 13-604, Supreme Court of the United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm
State of North Carolina, No. 13-604, Supreme Court of the United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
I plan to start with a discussion of the United State’s brief in support of granting cert, which offers an excellent jumping off point for a discussion of the merits of the case. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
See, for example, R v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:19 am
In Belle v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:44 am
¶11 (quoting Crook v. [read post]
