Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 40,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 8:42 am
This idea is that the challengers' interpretation asks the Court to read the statute to do something that would have to be stricken down as unconstitutional, because it would coerce the states to set up the exchanges. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:59 am
The Court has released the opinion in Montejo v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:17 pm
See Solvay S.A. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
Vergara v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
The final vote in Mullenix v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:45 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
WantYour Case Decided by a Really Cranky Arbitrator? Litigate Your Case in an Arizona Superior Court
28 Nov 2007, 8:33 am
Then head on down to Arizona where the Ninth Circuit has just held that he can be forced by State law to serve as your neutral for $75 per day -- all without violating the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 8:33 pm
.Christopher Irby v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:13 am
Written by Zuzanna Nowicka, lawyer at the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and lecturer at Department of Logic and Legal Argumentation at University of Warsaw In the aftermath of the judgment of the ICJ of 2012 in the case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, Lukaszewski v The District Court in Torun, Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica 59-220, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, and NJDB v JEG and anor. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:04 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court recently handed down its much-anticipated decision in Rosenbach v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:12 pm
California Supreme Court mandates employee meal and rest breaks On April 12, 2012, the California Supreme Court handed down a decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
Prosecutors may well be concerned that release of the report could add fuel to the fire for venue transfer motions later down the road—that is, it could bolster arguments by putative defendants who claim they cannot obtain an impartial jury in Fulton County. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
This reminds me a little of the anti-IMDb law recently passed by the California legislature, which also was struck down as unconstitutional in IMDb v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm
The Double Quick v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
Circuit struck down the Trump plan. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
In this regard, the Court of Appeal referred to the most recent Supreme Court case on vicarious liability, Mohamud v Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc [2016] UKSC 11 in which it had been stated that “motive was irrelevant”. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
From Northrup v. [read post]
