Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 9,552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
The law does not permit it. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
Issues Addressed 1) Spoliation of Evidence and Duty to Preserve Evidence. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Then, the court shall consider the amount of any award.1. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Does 1-7, 2017 WL 3048761 (Cal. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
But, why does he believe that this is an acceptable level of theft? [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Given the Biden Administration’s focus on antitrust, it is curious that the Capital Proposal does not discuss its potential impact on market concentration.7 From an international perspective, the Capital Proposal could reduce the competitiveness of US banking organizations versus banking organizations from jurisdictions with less punitive capital standards, including the Endgame Standard, potentially limiting international engagement by US banking organizations and a further reduction… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:41 pm
According to the ID, the constructions to all but the last element of claim 1 were disputed. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
.), in which pseudonymity was likewise denied; Fowler is Kevin Spacey: [1.] [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
But this does not mean that size is irrelevant. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:12 am
In the present report, the Working Group suggests a range of measures that States could take to operationalize the call to take additional steps with regard to State-owned enterprises, by building on existing international guidance and national practices related to the corporate governance of those enterprises. (2016 WG Report, p.1)The Press Release announcing the 2016 WG Report also noted that the "Working Group will also lead discussions on SOEs at the annual UN Forum on Business and… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
In so doing, they ensure their identity does not detract from their work skills. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
., No. 1:20-cv-03036 (E.D.N.Y.) [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
However, it does adopt certain immunities, including from lawsuits unless authorized by Congress.[32] On the cause for unjust enrichment, the Court held that the claim did not fit the nature of unjust enrichment, for the Plaintiffs were not seeking compensation for a benefit received by the Smithsonian.[33] Additionally, as a matter of injury, they have not shown that irreparable harm would occur in transferring the objects to Nigeria.[34] The Plaintiffs then sought a permanent inj [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:03 pm
This does not extend to any newspaper, newspaper wire service, or radio or television station, though the state may use any news wire service if no other means of communication is available and the state pays a reasonable value. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
Does this trend reflect a durable change in attitudes towards crime and punishment, or is this about short-term fiscal pressures and the need to reduce bloated corrections budgets? [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
The Flawed Application of a Generally Accepted Methodology If a meretricious expert witness by pretense or ignorance invokes a standard methodology but does so in a flawed or distorted, or in an invalid way, then there will be a clear break in the chain of inferences from data to conclusion. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
The unacknowledged shift from $50 to $1 no doubt was the result of complaints from artists, but it definitely does not take into account the complaints from the Copyright Office. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Behind the Red Curtain: environmental concerns and the end of communism. 2 J.E.L. 1-35 (2009).Gatmaytan-Magno, Dante. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:58 am
Jude Medical, Inc. on the meaning of “patented invention” in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
After discovery, it dropped those claims but added an allegation that the opposed application was invalid because Emeny lacked a bona fide intention to use the mark IDEAS INSIDE at the time of filing his intent-to-use application under Section 1(b).Intel had the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Emeny lacked the requisite bona fide intention to use his mark in connection with the recited services. [read post]
