Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 14,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2018, 9:00 am
They’re only passing 44% on to hiring managers while wishing they were passing along at least 54%. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm
Locate each smoke detector in your home and look for the “Kidde” brand name on the front. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:02 am
With only 1 in 4 new generics being placed on formularies when they’re introduced, highly rebated brand drugs are crowding out the lower list price drug offerings. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
And as for reinforcing your brand, be careful. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
If you’re lucky and you have a small enough organization or if you’re close enough to the front lines, you have an advantage. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:00 am
How are you presenting those values to prospective candidates, and are the candidates you’re reaching the right fit? [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am
Brande. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:07 am
” In turn, this creates employees who care about your brand and will execute your brand vision, even if you’re not around. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 11:41 pm
They're art projects, films ... things like that. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 6:21 pm
News–I suspect it is the only thing keeping the brand alive. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 11:15 pm
"The Board observed that, under In re Mucky Duck Mustard Co., 6 USPQ2d 1467 (TTAB 1988) and In re Albert Trostel & Sons. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:51 pm
Don’t be afraid to retain counsel to help with this process; a few days’ worth of legal work upfront is a lot less time and money than needed to defend a lawsuit and/or re-brand. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm
But often these makers and marketers just pop up again someplace else with new brands and different labels. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:24 am
You're not tied down by any core principles. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:05 am
And no employee should be expected to use tech they’re not prepared for. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 6:42 am
This blindness contributed to the program’s counterproductive branding such as the creepy all-seeing-eye logo. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:54 am
More content = more hooks in the water for search, more potential pages for users to share and helps establish a brand as referential. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 4:00 am
We're having fun. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:53 pm
(The whole timeline is here if you’re that interested.) [read post]
