Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 8021 - 8040 of 18,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
Years Ago: In London with Justice Scalia & Nadine Strossen (then President of the ACLU): “We started talking about some First Amendment cases, particularly Hill v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:21 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Mr Willers’ appeal will be heard before a full panel of nine Justices on 7 March 2016. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:01 pm by familoo
The judgment sets out the relevant extracts from the key authority Ridehalgh v Horsefield, and Watson v Watson [1994] 2 FLR 194. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:57 am by SHG
  Fighting losing battles as they’re conscripted into an ideology army that has already consumed higher education. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am by SHG
Copyright © 2007-2016 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Or, à la lumière de R. c. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 8 March it will hear the appeal of Re an application by JR55 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) on whether the Northern Ireland Commissioner for Complaints has a power to recommend that a consolatory payment be made by the respondent GP (JR55) following a finding of maladministration. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Following Justice Scalia’s death, the Supreme Court simplified its docket by denying certiorari to a set of patent cases, including: Arthrex v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
  Between Watts and Hamilton, that’s sixteen state supreme court justices in favor of the learned intermediary rule and zero against.The learned intermediary renaissance has been particularly noticeable in the Mountain West. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm by Corynne McSherry
Not surprisingly, those same rights-holders want to interpret last year's Supreme Court decision in the ABC v. [read post]