Search for: "L & I" Results 8021 - 8040 of 36,334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 4:55 pm by Bridget Crawford
I've prepared a guide to submitting to 29 specialty law reviews and law journals classified by the W&L Law Journal Rankings under the subject  "Gender, Women and Sexuality," as well as  5 additional journals with the word "gender" in the title. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The facts of silica cases, for example, are radically different from early exposure asbestos cases because of the wide diffusion and general equality of knowledge of silica hazards throughout industry, labor, and government.[7]  The dangers of occupational exposure to crystalline silica were so well known that the New York Court of Appeals recognized, seventy years ago, that “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Many BMC personnel in fact had such backgrounds, but the bureau’s director was John L. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:00 am by Steve Matthews
Étant donné que la capacité du médicament de causer des effets secondaires de nature neuropsychiatrique n’a pu être établie, et ce, malgré de rigoureuses évaluations pendant presque 30 ans, et puisque la prévalence de tels effets est très faible, l’intimée était fondée à inclure ceux-ci dans la section «Effets secondaires» de la partie I des… [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I, 747 S.W.2d 373 (Tex. 1988),termination is a justified remedy when the landlord breaches the commercial lease. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:05 am
.* * * * * * * * * * * * Precedential No. 10: TTAB Dismisses Rare Section 2(c) Opposition Due to Death of Named Individual Precedential No. 36: TTAB Gives the Boot to Nike's Inadequate Section 2(a) and 2(c) ClaimsPrecedential No. 4: TTAB Affirms 2(a) and 2(c) Refusals of "PRINCESS KATE" and "ROYAL KATE" for Clothing Precedential No. 12: TTAB Reverses Section 2(c) Refusal of FRANKNDODD for Legislative Information ServicesTTAB Affirms Section 2(c) Refusal of MARTIN &… [read post]
16 May 2019, 1:41 pm by Daniel S. Blynn
As to the TCPA’s definition of “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS or more commonly known as “autodialer”) litigation post-ACA Int’l v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am by MOTP
I would not.The majority opinion contravenes the established rule of law that theUniform Commercial Code (the UCC) preempts common-law claims and defensesthat conflict with established principles of banking and commercial law. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:20 am by Jay Cohen
Shoemake Courtroom 3-I 458th District Court Judge Robert L. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:35 am
 Over to Léon who reports on this case:"Last week, on 7 May 2019, the Court of Appeal of The Hague delivered its decision in a case between Philips and ASUS regarding the infringement of Philips’ European patent EP 1 623 511, which is essential to the HSUPA protocol of the UMTS standard. [read post]