Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 8021 - 8040 of 16,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2015, 12:47 pm
I don't know that for a hundred percent, no. . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:09 am
  The substantive issue was “anti-trust injury,” which doesn’t matter here except to the extent that the district court held that the plaintiffs didn’t have any cognizable injury. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:55 am by Ron Coleman
 And I don’t understand what they do, either. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:07 am by SHG
This isn’t to say it’s not culpable conduct, but surely these aren’t the same and shouldn’t be sentenced under some knee-jerk regime that demands that all murderers be given the same sentence. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:19 am by David DePaolo
Enough people have said that workers' compensation isn't working, and that there are many different laws now that provide various levels of employee protection that didn't exist previously.While there may be some Supreme Court interference with Oklahoma's opt-out plan, or any such state plan that may come to be in the future for that matter, opt-out is here to stay, and will be coming to a state near you earlier than you might expect.This industry is… [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:29 am by SHG
” Another U.S district court judge, Mark W. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
First, most of the statements at issue predated the registration date for the mark (though that really shouldn’t matter since trademark rights depend on use, not registration). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm by Ron Coleman
(And this is why, once again, class, it matters when people who should know better refer to “trademarking” when they mean registering a trademark.) [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
., a boy not yet 3½, came to preschool with marks on his face suggestive of physical abuse. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
., a boy not yet 3½, came to preschool with marks on his face suggestive of physical abuse. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Plaintiffs alleged a policy against the sale of returned goods as a matter of quality control. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 5:20 am by Ron Friedmann
Super-rich firms with mainly price-insensitive matters need not worry about the Axiom deal. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Wasn’t this a contradiction in the government’s position? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:21 am by Doorey
 So it matters why Crown does not want some of the employees back. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:02 am
 This European trade mark judges' network. [read post]