Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 8021 - 8040 of 8,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
Since 2000, Congress has heard testimony on several ADA reform and notification bills, all of which laid the groundwork for H.R. 620. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
I've heard many people say "If these laws protect one child, then they are worth it! [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
While you have a right to make your views heard, the government has no obligation to listen. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 I commend them to you if you’ve not already heard or read them. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But, as the United States Supreme Court has observed in a different but related context, the "inappropriate or controversial character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
(I've heard of cherry trees and Japanese maple trees, but I have to admit, the species the commenter suggests planting is definitely not available at my local garden center.) [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:46 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Superior Court denied this argument citing the Plain Smell doctrine “Plain smell” standard adopted in State of Arizona v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
We function through a government that provides total freedom for the minority to be heard, to dissent and to disagree, and to try to influence the collective thinking of the nation to make their minority view into a majority view. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm by The Legal Blog
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:31 am by Russell Knight
The United States Supreme Court has opined: “In our adversary system, in both civil and criminal cases, in the first instance and on appeal, we follow the principle of party presentation. [read post]