Search for: "Mark" Results 8041 - 8060 of 148,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 3:06 am
In re Iris Data Services, Inc., Serial No. 86455558 (April 24, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lykos).The Marks: The cited mark is registered in standard character form, and could be used in the same font, color, and design as the applied-for mark. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:56 pm by Afro Leo
If the owner of that trade mark is a trust, then the rights in that trade mark are governed by the legal agreement governing the trust.The challenge with the Mandela brand is that it is so well known that in some cases it will have difficulty functioning as a trade mark. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 3:39 am
Casagrande) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark MÁXIMO SANTANA for "Mezcal; Distilled agave liquor; Distilled blue agave liquor," in view of the registered mark SANTANA for "wines. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:59 am by Dennis Crouch
My friends at the MBHB law firm have created a new information resource on the pending false marking patent cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
Use of a mark for services requires more than merely advertising with the mark. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
Use of a mark for services requires more than merely advertising with the mark. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by David Pabian
However, the definition of “related company” makes clear that the use of the mark must be controlled by the mark owner. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:13 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Board held that it was likely that use of the mark CHANEL by the Applicant would cause dilution by blurring of the Opposer’s CHANEL mark. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:57 am
What they said, in a judgment delivered by Toulson LJ, was this: * In the case of an alleged infringement under section 10(2) of the Trade Marks 1994 Act (similar marks/goods, similar marks/same goods or same marks/similar goods) giving rise to criminal liability under section 92, a likelihood of confusion had to be proved -- but no likelihood of confusion need be proved for liability under section 10(1) (same marks/same goods). * This was a section 10(1)… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:56 am by Kai Schmidt-Hern
The mark is protected for potato snacks and potato crisps. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:13 pm
“Last week Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan, the former Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, judges who admitted taking millions of dollars in kickbacks from the operator of two juvenile detention centers, withdrew their guilty pleas after a federal judge rejected their agreement with the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:50 pm
MARK STEYN: Truther And Consequences: Megan McArdle writes: If the right ever wants to get back in power, it needs to start policing its lunatic fringe. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
MARK TAPSCOTT: The Obama Energy Crisis As You’ve Never Before Seen It. “It’s been eclipsed somewhat in recent months by the continued stagnation of the economy and the increasingly loud Republican presidential nomination battle, but the energy crisis caused by President Obama’s Permatorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico is just as serious as it ever was. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark AMERICA'S FAVORITE for mustard, finding it likely to cause confusion with the identical mark registered for ketchup. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:15 am
"Laches: Unique argued that Shelby was guilty of laches due to its delay in seeking to register the marks. [read post]