Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 12,301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2013, 1:09 pm
Many things could have caused or contributed to the multi-level collapse of the garage floors. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:04 pm
The paper omits crucial language from Mathews v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm
We should have additional concerns about informed consent, given that the participants by definition all suffer from some level of MCI. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
Accordingly, the level of analysis (scrutiny) a government action will receive incorporates those concepts. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
Accordingly, the level of analysis (scrutiny) a government action will receive incorporates those concepts. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am
Thus, "although the police had a valid basis for the initial encounter, there was nothing that made permissible any greater level of intrusion' " (id., quoting People v Howard, 50 NY2d 583, 590, cert denied 449 US 1023). [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 7:18 am
In Terry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm
” It has resulted in various laws at the state and federal level that set caps on damages for certain claims or make adjustments to the jurisdiction of various courts to hear specific types of cases. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
And that may be why, at this particular period of time, people are casting about for solutions to dysfunction, and calling for constitutional amendments. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:15 pm
The People cited the case of People v McDermott which was decided in 1994. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 8:25 am
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Rostker v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
”) People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:23 am
People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm
It is sometimes suggested that the Supreme Court’s 1920 decision in Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
