Search for: "STATE v. BROWN" Results 8041 - 8060 of 8,834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
The book greatly influenced Thurgood Marshall, who “referred to the work as ‘the bible’ of Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
26 May 2025, 11:58 am by admin
For the moment, in the American legal academy, there seems to be a fair amount of support for the idea that the burden of proof in fact-finding is centered around a vigorous contest between the plausibility of competing stories advanced by the litigants. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  It may well be that the Third Defendant’s “notice and take down” procedure has not operated as rapidly as Mr Browne and his client would wish, but it does not follow as a matter of law that between notification and “take down” the Third Defendant becomes or remains liable as a publisher of the offending material. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
14 May 2025, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As ostensibly private law arrangements, racial covenants escaped constitutional constraints until 1948, when Shelley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Elena Kagan dissented from the court’s decision. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]