Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 8041 - 8060 of 13,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court ran through the key California cases: Comedy III, Winter v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Florian Mueller
The WHDA US PTO Litigation Alert blog reports on the latest filings of reexamination requests with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and two of them involve hardware patents Apple has previously asserted in court against Samsung, Google's Motorola Mobility, and HTC. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:43 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States, No. 2012-5130 (July 18, 2013), it all starts out seeming so simple. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:20 pm by WSLL
Stubson of Crowley Fleck, PLLP, Casper, WyomingDate of Decision: July 10, 2013Facts: This case involves a complicated series of events that have so far led to litigation in as many as three Wyoming district courts, a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, a bankruptcy proceeding in California, and this appeal. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 28 April 1988, the United States Senate unanimously approved mandatory AIDS testing of people convicted of sex crimes and drug crimes. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:21 am by Charles Kotuby
In the United States at least, judicial decisions deferring competence to arbitrators seem to be on the rise—if not in number, at least in profile. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 2:41 am by Florian Mueller
Between 1 AM and 2 AM local time on Sunday, Samsung's counsel in the intellectual property dispute with Apple notified the court of a "final" Office action by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejecting all claims of Apple's pinch-to-zoom API patent, U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Three days later, it petitioned the United States District Court for the Central District of California, seeking to protect the customers of corporation-two, also a broker-dealer and a member. [read post]