Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 12,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
Humphries and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
" Martin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
And if it does, I think most of the Justices will vote to reverse.The Equal Protection Clause analysis in this case strikes me as easy to reverse on the facts of this case (and recall that this was an as-applied challenge, focusing on the facts of this case). [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
" Named defendants include New York City, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, three Doe officers, and the Yankees. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
The defendant said, “’I’m not breaking no law. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:52 pm
” As a result, the Court held that a defendant who threw a Molotov cocktail through the window of an owner-occupied residential house could not be guilty under §844(i) because the house was not “active[ly] used” in interstate commerce. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 2:37 pm
… In reply, Defendant asserts that Rule A-1 does not prohibit the filing of AAA appeals and that the AAA’s Consumer Arbitration Rules apply to its appeal. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am
The filing decision typically results in the prosecutor filing a charging document, called an "information," for all of the same charges for which the defendant was arrested. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
However, the acquittal does not mean that the defendant is deemed innocent. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
See Doe v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
See Doe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm
In 2013, the Court of Appeals in Wisconsin in Habush v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:10 pm
But it does provide a very interesting fact situation to discuss. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:20 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Even if the information meets the test, it does not necessarily follow that it would be proper for the defendant to disclose it. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
This time, Justice Stevens in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
8 C.P.R. 316.1O(b)(I)(ii). [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 8:47 am
Doe * Court Blasts “Copyright Troll” for Treating Courts “as an ATM”–Strike 3 v. [read post]
