Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 8061 - 8080 of 40,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2020, 7:31 am by Martin A. Schwartz
This issue has been largely addressed by so-called “carveout” or “bad-boy” guarantees triggering full personal liability for the debt by a guarantor upon a bankruptcy filing. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Policymakers and tax experts are also looking at a variety of corporate tax proposals that are focused on large, multinational companies. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Up until the Court of Appeal decision in Lloyd v Google LLC, many of these key legal issues had still not been fully considered. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:05 am by Florian Mueller
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has just published its long-awaited FTC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tabatha Abu El-HajIn my last post, I suggested that McKesson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The UK Legal Approach The starting point for construing contracts of all kinds under English law is well settled and was succinctly expressed  by Lord Neuberger in Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619, at paragraph 15 where he said: “When interpreting a written contract, the court is concerned to identify the intention of the parties by reference to “what a reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would have been available to the parties… [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:34 am by Steve Gottlieb
I know a fair amount of the history and statues don’t influence me much although as a teen my family took me, at my request, to see many of the iconic battlegrounds in New York where a large part of the Revolution was fought. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Although there is no evidence that the protest writ large descended into violence, a police officer was severely injured by a heavy object thrown by an unknown assailant. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
Last year, President Trump responded angrily to the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]