Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 8061 - 8080 of 120,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
Thus, "although the police had a valid basis for the initial encounter, there was nothing that made permissible any greater level of intrusion' " (id., quoting People v Howard, 50 NY2d 583, 590, cert denied 449 US 1023). [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:30 am
May 2009 5-21-09 Hearing on "The U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:14 am
Mata, holdingthe electric chair is cruel and unusual and may not be used any longer.Amy Miller, Legal Director for ACLU Nebraska and Chair of NebraskansAgainst the Death Penalty, said, "Nebraska's electric chair was made in1919, and we're still using that same chair. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:41 am by Charnovitz
Pigs and World Trade 11 May 2023 The decision by the US Supreme Court today in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 10:00 am by Unknown
Blog posts & press:Adjudicating Old Questions in Refugee Law: MN and Others v Belgium and the Limits of Extraterritorial Refoulement (EU Immigration & Asylum Law & Policy Blog, May 2020) [text]"Briefing: In Search of a More Humane EU Migration and Asylum Policy," The New Humanitarian, 21 May 2020 [text]EU Fundamental Rights, Human Rights and Free Movement in Times of Covid19 (RLI Blog, May 2020) [text]IOM, UNHCR Urge European States to… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 4:19 pm
The Seventh Circuit gives us a pithy definition of fiduciary duty in INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INCORPORATED v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
  I am already wielding this judgment, both in headline and in nuance, and I’m sure the same is true of all of us. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kids start an action in US District Court saying that they own the building, and what's going on? [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:29 am
The argument in Safford United School District v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 2:23 pm
Tex. 2004) (holding that the use of a scraper to glean flight information was unauthorized as it interfered with Southwest’s use and possession of its site, even if the scraping did not cause physical harm or deprivation), with Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm by WIMS
The plaintiffs argue neither that the project as a whole is contrary to the public interest nor that it was sectioned in order to prevent consideration of its total environmental harms. . .They may be playing a delay game: make the Corps do a public interest analysis from the ground up (along with an all-at-once six-section permit analysis) in the hope that at least until the analysis is completed there will be no further construction, so that until then the highway will end at… [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 pm
This Act may be cited as the `Freedom and Innovation Revitalizing U.S. [read post]