Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8061 - 8080
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
” For further information on this subject see also: David Mark, Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning (New York: Roman & Littlefield, 2006) and John G. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Does Positivity Really Matter? [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Non-Standard Deviations The First Deviation – Changing the Ascertainment Period After the Data Are Collected The protocol apparently identified a primary endpoint to be: “the mean increase in [copper 65] excretion in fecal matter above the baseline (mg/day) averaged over the study period … to test the hypothesis that the release of [zinc] either from Fixodent or Zinc Acetate impairs [copper 65] absorption as measured in feces. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
"[I]t is immaterial whether the beliefs sought to be advanced by association pertain to political, economic, religious or cultural matters, any state action which may have the affect of curtailing the freedom to associate is subject to the closest scrutiny. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:32 pm
” Whereas the paper asks: “Why can’t a European, Canadian, etc. be more like an American? [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
Watch the video here (it’s especially interesting around the 34″ mark): . [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
Second, Fitbug wasn’t diligent in protecting its mark. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
This is not a hippie answer to a yuppie question, but two slogans whose registrability as trade mark was investigated by the General Court in Case T-609/13 and Case T-59/14, explains Valentina. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:25 pm
Worse still, if the matter is not heard before the judge before the 1 year mark, it is considered late when the trial occurs (i.e. outside the filing window), and the judge will have to permit it to move forward and waive the 1 year window. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:36 pm
Now the techdirt blog reports that it is home to a trade mark dispute over the names of noodle restaurants. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:42 pm
I find this rationale to be compelling, especially given the Court’s marked deference to the executive in Khadr. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
And when I presented the GPs to the Human Rights Council I stated that its endorsement would not end all business and human rights challenges; but I added that it would mark [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
We concluded `that, given the employee’s consent to his employer’s monitoring of both computers, the employee had no reasonable expectation of privacy when he used the home computer for personal matters. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
When the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 4:22 pm
Why should this matter? [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
Who knew there were that many murders (or, for that matter, Carrs) in Kansas? [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:02 am
Therefore being able to sell t-shirts to fans as well as candles and the like is important even for superstars like Taylor Swift. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 pm
It’s easy to say that safe havens don’t matter if everywhere is a safe haven. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 11:46 am
You shouldn’t rely on one client for 100% of your business, no matter how much business they give you. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 11:08 am
But does it matter what 'permissions' have been given or withheld anyway? [read post]
