Search for: "People v Word" Results 8061 - 8080 of 17,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 12:26 pm
This would be what is typically referred to as an IT person. 2) The need for someone to help you with the word you used: “efficiency” - in other words, the “front office” part of using technology in your practice. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:15 pm by Steve Bainbridge
  In Balkin's case, it's the Thirteenth amendment and "the (in)famous 1830 case of State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 5:43 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Michigan Court of Appeals' decision in People v Pennebaker takes the "house arrest" option away from sentencing judges in felony drunk driving cases.In Pennebaker, a case originating in the Oakland County Circuit Court, the Court of Appeals held that people convicted of a felony drunk driving offense must perform a minimum of 30-days incarceration pursuant to the drunk driving statute, and that "incarceration" cannot involve… [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kevin
Deen denies she said the "n-word" when referring to people she wanted to have wait on guests at the "southern-style plantation wedding" she planned for her brother, though she admits she was referring to black people. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher: Tribal government and enterprise clients usually are American Indian people, and they want to hear the views and advice of people who have shared many of their same experiences. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 10:09 am by Eugene Volokh
" The video, initially posted to the social media platform TikTok on Thursday, went viral after showing the two teenagers using the n-word and making disparaging remarks about black people. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:35 pm by Joe Consumer
For more, see the Alliance for Justice's great new report, AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 11:25 pm
There is also a link to Patently-O, wherein the word "Dudas" arises once, in a comment: However, a caveat in the Tafas case: "Because this case involves the legality of the Final Rules, a determination of their validity does not turn on facts unique to a particular plaintiff or on any disputes regarding such facts" Tafas v. [read post]