Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 16,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2015, 9:17 am
On March 25, the Court will hear argument in consolidated appeals in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 5:08 am
So it comes as no shock that the New Jersey Supreme Court held that section 3 of the Bias Intimidation law, N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1, was rejected as unconstitutional in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:27 pm
The only authority cited to support the view in Davids, supra and Warren's Heaton, supra, is Whitehead v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
Van TassellThis bill makes a minor change to Section 73-3-3. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
My 2014 William Brennan lecture on NFIB v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[t]he Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:28 pm
Where testator dies seized of real property in several states the courts of each state may construe the will as to the realty situated in its own state (Matter of Good's Will, 304 N.Y. 110, 116, 106 N.E.2d 36, 39, supra; In re Ellis' Estate, Sur., 139 N.Y.S.2d 640; De Vaughn v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
Relying in particular on the views of Lord Fraser of Tullybelton in G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647 Lord Reed concluded: “The question, therefore, is whether the court below went wrong. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
”) State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
His friendships and emotional state were negatively impacted. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
” There’s no digital single market when travellers can't use the services they pay for once they cross a border, linguistic minorities are denied access to cultural works in their native language, innovative services are only available in the big member states because of varying regional hurdles – or UK MEPs are blocked from following the cricket in Brussels. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:19 pm
In issuing this opinion, the state high court: (1) clarified that state courts should follow longstanding federal court guidance in Faragher v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm
In Green v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
The distinction between the majority and minority goes to the heart of the issue of deference and the relationship between the courts and the executive in the context of Human Rights. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Law):Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Living Gardens, Living Art, and Living Tradition, (5 IP Theory Journal 73 (2015)).Mark Walters, Succession to the Throne and the Architecture of the Constitution of Canada, (Queen's University Legal Research Paper No. 2015-001 (2014)).Lorenzo Zucca, A Secular Manifesto for Europe, (March 5, 2015).Anuradha Chadha, A Case for Reservation in Favour of Religious Minorities,(March 6, 2015).Mariano Croce, Secularization, Legal Pluralism,… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:31 am
Walker called Univest I Corp. v Skydeck Corp., Index No. 2014-811644. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 8:47 am
Additional Resources: U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: U.S. v. [read post]
