Search for: "State v. Word" Results 8061 - 8080 of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2018, 9:11 pm by Lyle Roberts
Supreme Court has issued a decision in the Cyan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Dan
  There is a famous U.S. torts case, Summers v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 5:25 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting court decision in a university sexual misconduct case, decided last week by the New York intermediate appellate court (though quite possibly eventually headed to the New York high court), Matter of Haug v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
Continuing, he also noted that in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) [2018] UKSC 56, the Supreme Court “upheld the distinction drawn between amendments to delete claims that have been held to be invalid and amendments designed to make good a claim not thus far advanced in the amended form”, in other words confirming that what the Court of Appeal had said in IPCom and Nikken was correct. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 8:37 am by Gail Whittemore
The state later dedicated a memorial to Justice Marshall, engraved with the words “Equal Justice Under Law” on the Lawyer’s Mall in front of the Maryland State House in Annapolis. from the In Custodia Legis blog of the Librarians of Congress [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:06 pm by PaulKostro
In other words, determination of the fact that the gift is a “testamentary substitute depends upon the donor’s subjective state of mind at the time of the transfer, and that state of mind is a question of fact . . . to be ascertained by reconstruction by means of objective indicia. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:05 am by JB
I particularly admire his rejection of United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 11:57 pm
The United States Court of Appeals just handed down a decision that confirms this position, ruling that under the Federal Arbitration Act, there is no prehearing discovery from third parties.In Life Receivables Trust v. [read post]