Search for: "A. G."
Results 8081 - 8100
of 65,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2021, 6:48 am
In reviewing this in the context of this case, the court referred to Weltimmo sro v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság [2016] 1 WLR 863, where the Court of Justice of the European Union held that: the absence of a branch or subsidiary was not the determining factor; the test for “establishment” would be satisfied if there was “any real and effective activity – even a minimal one –… [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 6:47 am
The episode is available here (Apple podcast here) and, in it, I discuss three common forms of contractor relationships: Teaming Agreements, Joint Venture Agreements, and the federal Mentor-Protégé Program. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
(Forthcoming).Robert G. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
Hell no … F*****g [“n”-word]s. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Second, G v G. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am
Un reciente auto de la Sala tercera del Tribunal Supremo de 25 de febrero de 2021(rec.1481/2019) constituye un espléndido ejemplo del buen hacer jurisdiccional con una formación de sala especializada y con ideas claras, bajo la pluma de un ponente extraordinario, Don Francisco José Navarro Sanchís, que ya nos había demostrado en el pasado su destreza expositiva, lucidez argumental y su defensa de las libertades y derechos, con elegancia y sin desfallecimiento. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
Doing so reveals significant infirmities within the most well-known corporate governance datasets, including an error rate exceeding eighty percent in the G-Index, the most widely used proxy for “good governance” in law and finance. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 12:33 pm
The Cuban Law Review (Revista Cubano de Derecho) has just published its inaugural issue. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 12:02 pm
Richards, Lee G. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:41 am
The defendants' (with the plaintiff's support) seek to file under seal, exhibits A through G of their motion to enforce a settlement agreement. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Or, la demanderesse allègue que, en agissant ainsi, la défenderesse a dévoilé à ses concurrents ses secrets commerciaux, protégés par leur entente de confidentialité. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 3:30 pm
—Section 2107(g) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9025(g)) is amended to read as follows: “(g) APPLICABILITY. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 1:13 pm
Stevenson and Sandra G. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:37 pm
Excerpts from California Chief Justice Tani G. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 11:01 am
Aegis reportedly also violated Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Rules G-30 and G-17 by failing to purchase municipal securities for its own account from a customer, or sell municipal securities for its own account to a customer, at an aggregate price (including any mark-up or mark-down) that was fair and reasonable in connection with two municipal bond transactions. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 11:01 am
Aegis reportedly also violated Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Rules G-30 and G-17 by failing to purchase municipal securities for its own account from a customer, or sell municipal securities for its own account to a customer, at an aggregate price (including any mark-up or mark-down) that was fair and reasonable in connection with two municipal bond transactions. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
Según exponen en la demanda, las órdenes ejecutivas que le dieron luz verde a la expansión del currículo con perspectiva de género proponen la ampliación de la Ley 62 de 2017, mejor conocida como la Ley para disponer el desarrollo de un proyecto piloto de escuelas coeducativas dirigido a promover la equidad de género. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:07 am
Brian G. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:58 am
The trial judge in this case specifically found defendant to be a credible witness, and the Court ruled that “[g]iving due deference to the trial court’s credibility determination, the record supports the trial court’s conclusion that [plaintiff] failed to prove that [defendant] intentionally misrepresented the amounts owed. [read post]
