Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 108,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2008, 8:47 pm
On appeal from the district court [...] [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:02 pm
Hargis Industries, Inc. 13-352 Issue: (1) Whether the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding of a likelihood of confusion precludes respondent from relitigating that issue in infringement litigation, in which likelihood of confusion is an element; and (2) whether, if issue preclusion does not apply, the district court was obliged to defer to the Board’s finding of a likelihood of confusion absent strong evidence to rebut it. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
But does the privilege survive a corporation’s death by dissolution? [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeals of the State of California, Second Appellate District, recently affirmed a trial court’s judgment holding that the limitation on recovery under the Federal Trade Commission’s “holder rule” does not preclude recovery of attorney fees, costs, nonstatutory costs, or prejudgment interest against the assignee. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:47 pm
Anyone who does not receive this valuable email service should go to the WV Supreme Court’s website and click on the [...] [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:38 pm
Term 2d Dept. 2012) How many times does a no-fault appeal have four different issues in it? [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 am
On Tuesday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of appeals heard oral arguments (video of full arguments) in Doe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:14 am
The city does not list tattoo parlors in its zoning code [materials], and, as tattoo parlors must be registered under California law... [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:38 am
There has been an appeal to the CAFC.IPO will be filing an amicus brief. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:55 am
., the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that the Georgia Supreme Court’s 2012 opinion in Hoover v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
[JURIST] A three-judge panel for the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday that at times the government might need a warrant to obtain cell phone data to track a person's location. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:01 am
Melson challenged the use of midazolam in the three-drug cocktail used in Alabama executions, arguing that it does not properly insensate... [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:33 am
We look at how the FCC and courts have approached the issue and discuss recent significant decisions from federal appeals courts holding that the TCPA does not allow a consumer to unilaterally revoke consent when it is given as part of a bargained-for exchange. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:43 am
I’m glad I looked at the slip opinions from the court of appeals before I left. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:05 am
The case is certain to be appealed and has a good chance of being thrown out, as it does not seem clear that driving a car, even carrying a terrorist, is a war crime [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:21 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently held that a mortgagee’s office that was located within 200 miles of the mortgaged property, but did not conduct any mortgage-related business, was not a “branch office” of a “mortgagee” under the HUD rule requiring a face-to-face meeting with mortgage borrowers before filing a mortgage foreclosure action unless the mortgagee does not have a branch office within 200 miles of the borrower's home. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:23 pm
"Court Backs Warrantless Searches Abroad": The New York Times today contains an article that begins, "The authorities may lawfully conduct searches and electronic surveillance against United States citizens in foreign countries without a warrant, a federal appeals court panel said on Monday, bolstering the government's power to investigate terrorism by ruling that a key constitutional protection afforded to Americans does not apply overseas. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 9:10 am
Customs inspection of a laptop computer that found child pornography does not constitute an unreasonable search and seizure, a U.S. federal appeals court ruled. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
Ct. 292, which held that that neither Article III nor the Seventh Amendment bars IPRs, a holding that, according to the respondent, does not conflict with any decision of the Court or any other court of appeals, rendering further review unwarranted. [read post]
