Search for: "Doe 35" Results 8081 - 8100 of 17,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 7:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Is Freya’s claim subject-matter-eligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:00 am by Dr. Cassandra Steer
How does international law apply to this 21st century environment? [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Loser-Pays Attorney Fees: Third, the Act significantly expands 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:51 pm by Andy
At times his argument borders on the bizarre: he considers (page 35) that since the majority en banc decision says that an individual actor does not have a copyright stake in a scene in which he or she appears, therefore there is no copyright in the scene whatsoever. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:07 pm by Karen Hoffmann
” Her publications include: Litigating Reproductive Health Rights In The Inter- American System: What Does A Winning Case Look Like? [read post]
17 May 2015, 5:09 am by SHG
Prosecutors will ask for 35 years in prison. [read post]
15 May 2015, 11:47 am
There must have been some good in it, to stay with it for 35 years. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:53 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 First, if something is a work made for hire, the provision in U.S. copyright law that allows an author or her heirs to terminate any license or transfer after 35 years simply does not apply. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:02 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Stevens, now 35-years-old, played for nine years in the NFL for the Seattle Seahawks and Tampa Bay Buccaneers before retiring. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:03 am by Schachtman
This systematic bias, however, does not necessarily mean that both side’s expert witnesses will necessarily be unrepresentative or unscientific. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm by Jodie Liu
 Just because you call something, once again, the USA Freedom Act, does not mean that it’s the same as the last thing called the USA Freedom Act. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:50 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 271 does not admit to the sweeping notions of common-law tort liability argued in this case. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Mardonet, 2015 ONSC 1286 [35] The common law implied undertaking limits the use that the recipient of compelled disclosure can make of information obtained by that disclosure: Kitchenham v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Shawn Garrison
Judges could determine the exact split, but the minimum amount of time either parent could have would be 35 percent. [read post]