Search for: "F. v. R."
Results 8081 - 8100
of 20,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Section 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6)) requires that a manufacturer of a dietary supplement making a nutritional deficiency, structure/function, or general well-being claim have substantiation that the claim is truthful and not misleading. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:39 am
(See United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:25 am
Andrews v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:17 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Sali v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
In the second case, A.C. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 1:43 pm
(3)Given the impact of the statutory duty of care standard announced in Underwater Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:46 pm
F. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:23 am
Co., 285 F.3d 971, 976 (11th Cir. 2002) (rev'd on other grounds, PacifiCare Health Sys. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Firestone Fibers & Textiles Co., 515 F.3d 307, 313 (4th Cir. 2008); cf. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted that the case was decided by only a plurality, and that Justice Lewis F. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
(f) in Doran v Liverpool City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 146, the Court of Appeal had held that any challenge must be to the decision to bring possession proceedings, not to the possession proceedings themselves. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
University of Texas at Austin and were among the counsel to Representative F. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:40 pm
Videotek, Inc., 545 F.3d 1316, 1338 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm
They are pretty darn close to Sweden, which is why the original report in Nya Åland is in Swedish: Kommerserådet Anders Wiklöf har åkt fast för fortkörning på Järsövägen in mot Mariehamn på lördagen. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Regan 2016 ABQB 561, R. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:07 am
” Judge Chuang also cited Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
(Ruiz-Lopez v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
Employee terminated for omitting relevant information from his application for employmentMatter of Russell v New York Citywide Admin. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:57 pm
See Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:16 am
Disqualifying an individual who has intentionally made a false statement of any material fact in his or her application for public employment United States v. [read post]
