Search for: "Label v Label" Results 8081 - 8100 of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
Cumberland's Brannon Denning has a very interesting and enjoyable piece in the new Tennessee Law Review titled The New Doctrinalism in Constitutional Scholarship and District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:00 am
  Such was the ruling of the Cheshire County Superior Court in Denron Plumbing & HVAC, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 9:42 am by Michael H. Cohen
Medical directors at medical spas should be concerned that, unless the arrangement is carefully structured with an eye to legal rules and anti-kickback risks, regulatory enforcement authorities might perceive their role as sham and fraudulent.In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:43 am by Ronald Mann
Ultimately, a jury concluded that Fossil acted with “callous disregard” for Romag’s trademark rights, though it did not go so far as to label Fossil’s conduct “willful. [read post]
Jack Daniel’s claimed that Bad Spaniels infringed and diluted trademarks in the Jack Daniel’s bottle, and words and graphics on the label. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Friday's decision by Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in Nguyen v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 8:01 am by Dan Bressler
“Canada: Lawyer Who Was Consulted By Another Lawyer Disqualified From Acting Against Other Lawyer” — “2658396 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:49 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
A recent legal case, Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco v Australian Grape and Wine Incorporated [2023] SGCA 37, the Singapore Court of Appeal granted Consorzio’s application to register “Prosecco” as a Geographical Indication (“GI”) which designates wine originating from Italy. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am by David Post
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]