Search for: "People v Word"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 17,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2016, 1:11 am
The case is Maherlo v Charlet (pdf, in Spanish). [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
” More than 43,000 people signed the campaign’s petition. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
But his expression of puzzlement in Hugunin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:41 pm
Be sure to use a standard paste – using Ctrl V or “Keep Source Formatting” – rather than “Paste and Keep Text Only. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm
In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and it must carry a meaning that “[substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the claimant], or has a tendency to do so” (see Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:31 am
Schneiderman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:58 am
In Doe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm
The Classic Antitrust Case of Toys “R” Us v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm
The Classic Antitrust Case of Toys “R” Us v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm
The Classic Antitrust Case of Toys “R” Us v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm
For lawyers and lay people who generally don’t immerse themselves in the interstices of bankruptcy law, the most interesting part of today’s oral argument in Husky International Electronics v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm
A funny word. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:54 pm
In People v Cummings, the question was whether the officer unduly prolonged a stop by asking for a driver’s license after the original reason for the stop had vanished. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
In Weissberg v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
” Back in 1999, in Bernstein v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
Although she is aware the posts are public, and she has around 100 people who follow her, she testified she did not consider the potential impact on S.G. . . .For nearly a full day after these tweets, there was no reaction. [read post]
