Search for: "People v. House"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 12,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
The Judicial Review claim was (and is)of 3 decisions that had been made by the defendant were made under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996 that is concerned with applications to a local authority for assistance in cases of homelessness of vulnerable people in priority need. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:31 pm
People have tried to divert and detract from the focus of our fight towards irrelevant claims and gossip. [read post]
25 May 2013, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:16 am
under the Fair Housing Act's disparate impact theory. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:14 am
The House also passed a $50 million cut in the NLRB budget—on top of sequestration. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:18 pm
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in Fisher v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:24 pm
I, § 10 (“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures and unreasonable invasions of privacy shall not be violated . . . . [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
They lived in Zavala's house. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm
This a late note on OR -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Isle of Anglesey CC [2013] UKUT 065 (AAC) because, bluntly, I had read it quickly at the time and overlooked its broader significance.The issue was whether OR could receive housing benefit for his stays in a night shelter hostel. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm
This a late note on OR -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Isle of Anglesey CC [2013] UKUT 065 (AAC) because, bluntly, I had read it quickly at the time and overlooked its broader significance.The issue was whether OR could receive housing benefit for his stays in a night shelter hostel. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:41 am
Next month I have oral argument in Ochre LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
I will pledge to this committee and the American people that I will engage in such an analysis. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently decided the case of Missouri v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:22 am
Yet, in the case of The People v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:41 am
In this case, People v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm
Clashes started to erupt between both sides after a merge attempt failed,[3] despite the signing of an accord to share power.[4] On 25 June, the Islamist Ansar Dine took control of Kidal.[5]Protests broke out on 26 June in the city of Gao, the majority of whose people are not Tuaregs (as opposed to the MNLA), but rather sub-Saharan groups such as the Songhay and Fula peoples. [read post]
11 May 2013, 11:36 am
A political (or a religious) worldview places core commitments above empirical data, as was so clearly revealed in the case of The Vatican v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Answer: I’m sure there will be people who disagree, but the answer is “yes. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am
My December 2011 commentary was not the first or only time that I have attempted to educate people about the difference between enactment of a tax and enforcement of a tax. [read post]
