Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 8081 - 8100
of 9,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 2:37 am
Project Gutenberg is an American website which offers 56,000 free books, many of which have had their copyright expired in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Hansen spoke on behalf of the petitioners; General Verrilli on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae; Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
The Treasury Department added eight North Korean banks and 26 individuals to the Office of Foreign Asset Control’s sanctions lists, blacklisting them from any dealings with the United States, the New York Times reported. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
United States Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, accused by Virginia Giuffre of sexually assaulting her when she was a teenager under the control of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, has now countersued her in federal court in New York, claiming that her allegations are “lies, disparagement, defamation, harassment” that are “beyond the bounds of decency and not tolerated in civilized society. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:43 am
OSHA has instead pretextually redefined what is at this point a hazard of life in the United States and throughout the world—COVID-19—as a hazard of the workplace. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:30 pm
Pergament v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:42 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
The court therefore concluded that the benefit of suppression would be marginal or nonexistent and that the evidence was admissible under the good-faith rule of United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
That small group includes George Washington’s chief of staff, a future United States president, and a controversial New York state politician. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In one precedent, the Supreme Court ruled in Marsh v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Background The major impetus for science tutorials seems to have come from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
Scholars like Robert Neufeld have argued that states' sovereign immunity from patent damages represents an "imbalance" in the allocation of patent rights between states and private entities. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:47 am
From United States v. [read post]
