Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 15,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
The applicable statute of limitations, borrowed from state law, was four years. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
This exception ensured that the rationale of the Delaware Supreme Court, in its May 2014 decision ATP Tour v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
This exception ensured that the rationale of the Delaware Supreme Court, in its May 2014 decision ATP Tour v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:37 am
The State’s Attorney argues that a “willing speaker” must exist to implicate the First Amendment’s right to free speech, Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
In Bishop v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Does that mean it had obligations before it had notice (bearing in mind that the “no general obligation to monitor” protection of Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive does not apply)? [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:41 pm
” Eisenhauer v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
United States, Debs v. [read post]
Copyright in declaring API code: here's why I don't have any competition concerns (Oracle v. Google)
15 May 2015, 7:11 am
Reuters' Dan Levine, a world-class court reporter, has just published a story on what's going on behind the scenes of the U.S. government's decision-making ahead of its Supreme Court brief in Oracle v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:48 am
The dust has started to settle following the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 handed down recently (IPKat post here). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:50 am
This provision states that: "Member States shall ensure that reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses incurred by the successful party shall, as a general rule, be borne by the unsuccessful party, unless equity does not allow this. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:01 am
This notion is illustrated by what happened in Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:35 am
The case du jour is Dapeer v. [read post]
Schmidt on Brown and Constitutional History of Reconstruction (and a Postscript on Hurst and Gutman)
23 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
In this Article, I present the flurry of engagement with the history of the Fourteenth Amendment during the litigation of Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The court also cited its 1798 decision to postpone cases, which included United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Coleman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:03 pm
Further, as stated in the piece:"The protocol and consent form stated that at the end of the trial, the subjects "may elect to continue treatment for up to an additional 24 months. [read post]
