Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 12,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Id. at 406 (citing Graham v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The author argues that these three legal fields are strongly interrelated [They never used to be, notes the Kat. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
“Senate Bills Aim to Help Graduates in STEM Fields Get Green Cards”by Vanessa Kurzweil, RegBlog Staff (July 5) Two recently introduced bills in the United States Senate are designed to slow the "brain drain" of foreign-born scientists and engineers who return to their native countries after receiving graduate training in the US. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 7:16 am
But a little-noticed decision from the New York Court of Appeals (the State’s highest court) issued earlier this month makes an important contribution to the field. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 6:36 am
Anchor Toy Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
Additionally, the bill, without any stated rationale, narrows the field of qualified candidates that the political party can consider to those who have been registered members of that party for at least six months prior to the appointment. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
United States, No. 09-35734. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
” Ball Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:53 am
GTE Sylvania, Verizon v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In Taradejna v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 7:53 pm
In its recent decision in the case of Barnes v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
Treading gingerly into the treacherous quicksands of patent law, Warren J then stated that, i f the only difference between a claim's inventive concept and the prior art was an arbitrary feature, the alleged invention had no inventive step. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:10 am
See State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Next week in the courts On Monday 17 December 2012 there will be a hearing in the “phone hacking” case of Field v News Group Newspapers Ltd & anr. [read post]
