Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed and held that the Florida Supreme Court erred on both grounds. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
Enter the United States Supreme Court in Vance v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
In light of the Supreme Court's focus in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
But Bosch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
., cases such the California Supreme Court’s 1947 opinion in Perez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
Holder, and the two same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:36 am
Guido v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted the dismissal holding that patent '545 did not claim patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
Special Electric brokered South African crocidolite (blue asbestos) in the United States, including some sales (about 7,000 tons) to JM’s Long Beach, California, facility, which manufactured Transite. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:35 am
In the end, the California Supreme Court ruled in Robey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Thus, in California, while “an FDA[] conclusion is not binding . [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In the end, the California Supreme Court ruled in Robey v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am
A subsequent outbreak in California in 1985 confirmed the role of food in disseminating listeriosis. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:33 am
On July 1, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order (pdf) granting, in part, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys fees in Wild Equity Institute v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:12 am
Perez Hilton is being sued in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by a freelance photographer who alleges the gossip blogger posted photos of Glee star Darren Criss on his Web site without the photographer's permission.In the 22-page complaint including counts alleging copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 501 et seq.] and violation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act [17 U.S.C. sec. 1201 et seq.], Robert Caplin v. [read post]
