Search for: "Williams v. Williams"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 19,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am
At Opinio Juris, William Dodge discusses Cardona v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
William Kaplan further support this conclusion. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
CORE v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
Astiana v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Leslie, Justice Alito's Dissent in Loving v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 5:13 pm
Williams, 120 Misc.2d 68, 465 N.Y.S.2d 648. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
John Williams and I argued his appeal before this very court many, many years ago. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 pm
Last month in Williams v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm
" (People v Williams, 2015 NY Slip Op 02866 [4/7/15]) Thus, if a defendant waives Miranda, speaks to police about rape accusations, but refused to answer whether he had sex with the complainant, his refusal to answer could not be used to imply consciousness of guilt (the prosecution said the defendant "did not deny" having sex with the complainant) or to cast doubt on his other statements about the incident. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm
Matter of Julian B. v Williams, 97 AD3d 670). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:52 am
Williams (D. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
The most prominent example of this response is Thompson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:28 pm
Williams and Joshua B. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm
Grant v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
According to Techdirt (here), Judge William Martini dismissed the suit, saying the Florida business had "minimum contacts" with state residents aside from online sales of branded merchandise. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Burke Williams, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:19 am
Previously, the Court held that where, as here, a prosecutor seeks testimony that the defendant’s version of events was not believable, the witness’s “. . . testimony is equivalent to an opinion that the defendant is guilty, and the receipt of such testimony may not be condoned (People v Williams, 6 NY2d 18, 23 [1959]; People v Higgins, 5 NY2d 607, 627-628 [1959]; People v Gradon, 43 AD2d 842 [2d Dept 1984]). [read post]