Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 8121 - 8140 of 16,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 1:45 am by Ben
At that time in America lyrical and musical works enjoyed 95 years of copyright protection from publication (and registration), meaning the music will stay in copyright until 2030. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
Of Judge and Jura-prudenceJeremy reports on Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch), a decision where Mr Justice Arnold of the Chancery Division, England and Wales, addressed the possible likelihood of confusion between JURA ORIGIN for "Scotch whisky and Scotch whisky-based liqueurs produced in Scotland" and ORIGIN and ORIGINS earlier marks.* Three aspects of information: a new eventJeremy presents "Three… [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:56 pm
National Gypsum Co., 995 F.2d 346, 350-53 (2d Cir. 1993). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Freshbev LLC, 322 F.Supp.3d 330 (E.D.N.Y. 2018)Campbell bought several bottles of Freshbev juices at Whole Foods, allegedly relying on misrepresentations (1) that the juices were unpasteurized; (2) that the juices were cold-pressed; (3) that the juices were fresh; and (4) that the Cranberry Apple juice had more cranberry juice than apple juice.Initially, the court declined to resolve at this stage whether Bristol–Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Hell, just because you identify a risk doesn't mean those on it will be subject to a crackdown. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
Since the Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc [2014] 1 SLR 911, the comparison of trade marks in Singapore has invariably involved the question of technical distinctiveness.Technical distinctivness refers to the capacity of a trade mark to operate as a badge of origin. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:19 am by Lucie Fortune (Bristows)
This means that, even if the PI application were not dismissed, it should be stayed pending the outcome of those TBA proceedings. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
What is the proper forum for ultimately determining construction and the meaning of prior art? [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
Noyes & Co., 172 Ill. 2d 325, 334 (1996) (citing Downing v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm by admin
(Surah 4:1), This means that you are going to be asked about what you have done to the uterus which gave you the life (i.e. your mother). [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 5:09 pm
In In re King Koil Licensing Co., 79 USPQ2d 1048 (TTAB 2006), the TTAB affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of THE BREATHABLE MATTRESS ("MATTRESS" disclaimed), finding the mark merely descriptive of beds and mattresses. [read post]