Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 8121 - 8140 of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Erie, Defining Shariʿa in China: State, Ahong, and the Postsecular Turn, (Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review, Vol. 12, Pp. 88-117. 2014).Steven F. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
By retelling the story of the case, called Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:07 pm
In the decision particularly it is set forth that the business activities of Intel Corporation and our company do not cross paths. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Employer must show that employee's legal speech threatened the effective operation of the employer to prevail in disciplinary action taken against the employee Santer v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:51 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday, however, Corel Software filed a patent infringement complaint against Microsoft in the District of Utah (this post continues below the document): 15-07-27 Corel Software v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:36 pm by editor@howarddc.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposed joint stipulation and proposed stipulated notice of dismissal for Ellis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:23 am by John Jascob
The court concluded that the Commission's search was reasonable and adequate and granted its motion for summary judgment (Bartko v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:51 pm by Ken Moon
  The Crown is also cross-appealing the Court of Appeal finding that for extradition the usual requirement for double criminality contained in the Extradition Act prevails over a treaty with the United States which might suggest otherwise.It is unfortunate that none of the judges on the Supreme Court bench has IP law experience and further, this is only the second appeal involving copyright that has been heard by the Supreme Court since it was set up in 2003.It is likely to be… [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:18 am by Benjamin Iscoe
In the Ontario Divisional Court decision of Simpson v Global Warranty[1], the issue was the application of a specific termination clause in an employment contract where the employer violated the contract in the course of the termination. [read post]