Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 8121 - 8140 of 13,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2014, 6:41 am by Epstein Becker Green
Although this exception does not apply when the natural disaster indirectly causes the closing or layoff, the unforeseen business circumstances exception above might. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:15 am
The case is (1) Brian Wade (2) Geraldine Perry V British Sky Broadcasting Limited [2014] EWHC 634 and although Simon Cowell has nothing to do with it he still gets a mention in the judgment.It’s time! [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:06 am
The fact that the sellers are aware of the existence of that trade mark and of the origin which it indicates cannot, on its own, preclude such revocation;” (Paragraphs 28/29).In response to question 2, the CJEU held that Article 12(2)(a) Directive must “be interpreted as meaning that it may be classified as ‘inactivity’ within the meaning of that provision if the proprietor of a trade mark does not encourage sellers to make more use of that mark in marketing… [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:15 am by Florian Mueller
CHEVALIER'S RATE UP, NOT DOWN.AND IF YOU LOOK AT FOOTNOTE 1 IN APPLE'S BRIEF, THIS HAS GOT TO BE A FIRST IN THE HISTORY OF DAUBERT. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:13 pm by Giancarlo Frosio
Specifically, the Swedish referring court asked the ECJ whether linking to copyrighted materials constitutes “communication to the public” under EU copyright law, Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:57 am
A trustee that does extraordinary work can apply to the court for a commission in excess of the statutory fee. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 4:00 pm by Steve Sutton
  The FLSA does not prohibit a valid tip pooling arrangement among employees who customarily and regularly receive tips. 29 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:22 am
So let us analyse some statements in the press release" -- which is exactly what the author does. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:09 am
Well, at least Archie thinks so“This is the case”, continued the Court, “where the work is no longer available to the public on the site on which it was initially communicated or where it is henceforth available on that site only to a restricted public, while being accessible on another Internet site without the copyright holders’ authorisation” [this looks like a confirmation that one cannot link to works made available without the rightholder's consent].The CJEU… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
March 29, 2013), the plaintiffs’ "slight" evidence of noncompliance nonetheless failed:[E]ven if a jury could so find, Plaintiffs have offered no evidence that the noncompliance at issue affected the FDA’s determinations and "specific authorization." [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:38 am by Ben
 "Go to Top 101" was a 29-episode show in which a single contestant went up against 101 contestants. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
. ___ (1/27/14), the Supreme Court of the United States considered the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. [read post]