Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 9,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:29 am
Public comments may be mailed to Commission Meeting, EEOC Executive Officer, 131 M Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20507, or emailed to: Commissionmeeting@eeoc.gov. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:20 am
Donald DePass, Associate in our Washington, D.C. office, contributed to this entry. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:01 pm
” Does location really matter? [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
D.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:09 am
NLRB (D.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:02 pm
What matters is the overall concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and whether they continue to increase. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:11 pm
There's always Washington D.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:52 am
Instead, the question is an arcane but important one: whether the plaintiffs gave the Sudanese government proper notice of their lawsuit when they mailed their complaint to the Sudanese embassy in Washington, D.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:34 am
Bankruptcy fraud appears to be an offense subject to extradition under the treaty between the U.S. and France, said Douglas McNabb, an extradition attorney in Washington, D.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1269Issue: (1) (a) Whether the EPA’s Tailoring Rule violates the Clean Air Act by replacing Congress’s unambiguous numerical permitting thresholds with criteria of the EPA’s own choosing, and (b) whether the D.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
During the Perlbergers’ separation and divorce proceedings, the children may in fact have benefitted from trips to Washington, D.C. to visit relatives, or vacations and summers with friends at the beach house. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:58 am
It also involves precedent, which is a previous judicial ruling on a matter. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:06 am
Equally significant (although maddeningly time consuming) is the fact that they have sent the matter to an independent advisory board for further review. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:59 am
Figured the cushy gig with the lifetime guarantee might soften the blow a little, even if you’re dealing with D.C. types. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
He called the disqualification debate in the opioid lawsuits a ‘close case.'” “OptumRx is insisting that Motley Rice had subpoena powers while representing Hawaii, D.C. and Chicago, which it used to obtain confidential documents. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
To this question, the answer I see in Yates’s and Murphy’s account of third-wave standard setting might please those in the legal profession: law still matters. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:05 am
More to the point, people will latch onto whatever wild and crazy idea gets released into the wild, no matter how ridiculous and baseless. [read post]
