Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8121 - 8140
of 21,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2017, 6:21 am
The case is Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:09 am
Lemon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:46 am
S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Mrs Norman – The Wife who lost her ‘cloak of anonymity: Blog on the Court of Appeal decision in Norman v Norman. [read post]
University Rejection of Students’ Marijuana-Themed T-Shirt Violates First Amendment–Gerlich v. Leath
15 Feb 2017, 8:16 am
Case citation: Gerlich v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:06 am
Barn Light Electric Company, LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Direct Command --Constitution of the United States Article I, V --Notes and Questions --b. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
But the opening of Judge Korman’s opinion in Abidor v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:01 am
” At Casetext, David Boyle argues that current events show “that this may not be a good time for the Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Further Reading Opinion: Brown v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
Senator Richard Burr (R-NC), chairman of the SSCI, told reporters he hasn’t made a decision about whether Flynn should testify, while Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), the ranking Democrat on the committee, has said that he should. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:44 am
Cochran Firm, P.C. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:45 am
” Briefly: The World and Everything in It features discussions of Ziglar v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:36 am
” Walker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:37 am
In support of its federal dilution claim, Wawa points to a 1997 federal trademark dilution decision (Wawa v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Baltimore Sports & Social Club, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Art 104 of the Regulation states:(1) A Community trade mark court hearing an action referred to in Article 96 [i.e. counterclaims for revocation/declaration of invalidity], other than an action for declaration of non-infringement, shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own volition, after hearing the parties, or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other party, stay the proceedings where the validity of the Community trade… [read post]
