Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 8121 - 8140 of 28,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2014, 4:01 am by Steven Gursten
Department of Transportation’s Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance declared that recently enacted state “initiatives to permit use of marijuana for so-called ‘recreational’ purposes,’” such as Washington’s Initiative 502, would not change: “[T]he DOT’s longstanding regulation about the use of marijuana by safety-sensitive transportation employees … [such as] truck drivers …” Accordingly, the DOT… [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Corcoran and Pritchard v Van Nes. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:57 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Authority’s conclusion that this demonstrated “considerable continuity and momentum” and “the embers of an enterprise”, which could be passed to the respondents, was unimpeachable. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
  In early 2009, once the immediate danger had passed, the US Treasury ordered stress tests of the 19 biggest banks, and announced it would provide more taxpayer funds to shore up any weakness. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
I encouraged her to write up a blog post, and she kindly passed along the following: In the November 9th oral argument for Haaland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:28 am by Eric
The court considered previous decisions where a range of intermediaries, including real estate agents (Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60), television broadcasters (Universal Telecasters (Qld) Ltd v Guthrie [1978] FCA 9) and newspapers (Australian Ocean Line Pty Ltd v West Australian Newspapers Ltd [(1985) [1985] FCA 37), had not been liable for misleading and deceptive conduct for merely displaying advertising. [read post]